Avatar 2: Maddeningly stale

Compared with the "Avatar 1"more than a decade ago, Cameron is still doing the same thing, which is to use technology to create and display spectacle. It's just that from the wonders of the forest in "Avatar 1" to the wonders of the ocean in "Avatar 2".

In "Avatar 2", he spends a lot of time showing details and scenes, and the plot is seriously diluted.

The audio-visual details are well done in "Avatar 2". Tulkuns are like real creatures. The characters are more human than real people.

However, the bottleneck of the artistic value that technology can carry is highlighted:

1. When a fictional spectacle becomes more and more real, for the audience, it loses the interest of fiction at the same time. The fight scenes in "Avatar 2" are like other Hollywood movies we've seen. The program for capturing tulkuns is so clumsy;

2. When the technology reaches a certain height, it is difficult for human eyes to distinguish the difference between good and better. The enjoyment of technology will be reduced. "Avatar 2" did not bring me as much pleasure as the first one.

It uses technology to celebrate the beauty of nature. But let's not forget that this "nature" is built by Cameron's will. This is like a flock of stone sculptures on the prairie, which can only be realistic, but cannot be truly natural.

What made me even more unexpected is that as a three-act play, it has such a boring beginning, such a boring middle, and such an unremarkable climax.

The film also shows a certain self-loathing in America. The director worked tirelessly to reflect on the colonialism more than ten years ago, without even putting forward new understandings, without further development.

Whether technically or the story itself, "Avatar 2" is like a movie from the last century, which is crazy old. And there may be three more films like this.