The Red Carpet Rule We Actually Need

There is no country with which I have more of a love-hate relationship than France. On the one hand, French was the first second language I learned, and I have wonderful memories of my visits to the country. On the other hand… French culture is weird. And if you don’t know why I’m saying that, just look at Cannes’ new rules for its red carpet, because let me tell you, it’s hypocritical at best and outright asinine at worst.

So let’s talk about it.

Image description

If you missed the news last week, Cannes announced that it would no longer be allowing nudity or “voluminous outfits” on its red carpets. The second rule is boring at best - sure, big outfits might affect people’s ability to sit in the theatre, but what if they just wear it for the red carpet? Fashion is art, let people have fun.

But the first rule? No nudity? I’m almost vibrating with rage.

Look, I get it. Cannes wants to seem classy, and culturally we associate modesty with class. Now I’d argue that equating those two ideas already puts us in some questionable territory, but then add the fact that Cannes takes place in the same country that banned the burkini, and things start getting really uncomfortable. It’s not just about controlling bodies, it’s about controlling how we use and express them. Given that Cannes is meant to celebrate art… hypocritical, if not outright offensive.

But even if we somehow ignore that, there’s a bigger issue : what even is nudity? Is it a bare arm? A sheer dress? What about a sheer top? What if the nipples are male instead of female? The line is so blurry that I think I need to see an opthamologist. Also, let’s be real, nudity can be classy. It can even be artistic. The real issue Cannes is having is that “look classy” would be an even vaguer rule, so instead they’re banning nudity. That way, it sounds like they have a clear dress code when in reality, it’s more of a tool of arbitrary control and censure. It’s giving high school principal.

Image description
Then again, I shouldn’t be surprised that Cannes comes up with stupid rules since they made heels mandatory for women for a while.

No, if you ask me, there’s a much better rule that Cannes and all other prestige events should implement if they actually want to improve their red carpets: the outfits should be meaningful. How many red carpet interviews have you seen where the celebrity just says something stupid like “Who am I wearing? Oh, it’s Dior. Pretty, right?”

Newsflash - fashion isn’t always about looking pretty. It’s about self-expression. So I want to hear why someone chose to wear the outfit they’re wearing and what it’s doing from a functional or artistic perspective. If the celebs themselves don’t have the knowledge to explain their wardrobe, they can either skip the red carpet or bring the designer along to help them. Just imagine hearing the designer themself explain their process - it would be a dream. At the very least I’d hope it would cut down on the number of major fashion houses that shove boring ( or worse, hideous) dresses on celebrities in the name of brand deals.

Image description
If you think I’m going to forget this just because it wasn’t on the red carpet, you’re wrong. Is this really the best Gucci could do? I could buy this at Zara.

If an outfit looks boring or bad, I want someone to justify it to me. Explain the vision. If it’s not in the celebrity’s colour season, tell me why you made that choice - was the goal to seem disharmonious? To create a sense of severity or pallor? If it sits awkwardly on their body, tell me why it was cut the way it was. I know there’s a reason - Emma Stone’s look, for example, didn’t seem to suit her body well, but I can tell it’s intentional. Is it a reference to historical fashion? Is there a specific effect that they were going for? Just make me understand!

Hell, you know what, don’t just bring out the designers, bring out hair and makeup too, or a representative of all three. Fashion is such an underappreciated art, but red carpets could actually change that. They could force people to actually make an effort, to try to impress with their concepts rather than just their looks. Maybe it would even inspire a few celebrities to look for undiscovered talent in the hopes of really showing off.

Ah, who am I kidding. Brand deals will always win. But a girl can dream…

Image description

Cannes’ anti-nudity stance is obviously an attempt to make sure its red carpet stays respectable, but they’re going about it in the stupidest way I could possibly imagine. You know what’s really respectable? Knowledge. Thoughtfulness. Creativity. Everything that goes into a truly spectacular red carpet look. If we’re making rules, why not make some that teach about and promote art rather than restrict it?

You’d think people known for art like the French would know better - I know I used to.

Love-hate relationship, like I said.

7 Light Points

6 users sent Light to this article

imgimgimgimgimgimg
Comments 11
Hot
New
Ishika
Ishika
 · May 23, 2025
ya but I rlly don't wanna see a dick on the carpet. Also, you know today's society will objectify the fk out of any girl who's nude. Look at Kanye's stunt with his gf, it was so weird and I felt so uncomfortable knowing she was uncomfortable. Totally here for freedom of expression with fashion, but how is going fully nude fashion? If they're banning skin tight, or like cleavage, that's a different story. Also, shouldn't the red carpet for canned reflect the fashion of the movie they're promoting?
6
Reply

View replies 1

Matthew Alan Schmidt
Matthew Alan Schmidt
 · May 23, 2025
I don't think Cannes is trying to improve the red carpet at all. Both of these new rules seem intended to redirect attention from the red carpet and reinforce Cannes as a film festival, not a fashion show. I'm not saying I agree with the rules, but I can see where they're coming from.
4
Reply

View replies 2

Lucas.
Lucas.
 · May 23, 2025
It's a commendable idea that actors would share the red carpet with their stylists, but i think you're forgetting how narcissistic hollywood is. However, i agree with u that the no-nudity policy is a little weird, especially in this day and age.
2
Reply

View replies 1

The DC
The DC
 · May 23, 2025
It's like they're aiming for the safest middle ground possible. Not too voluminous, not too nude. Yeah, sounds boring
1
Reply

View replies 1

Gwen Pemberton
Gwen Pemberton
 · May 23, 2025
I'm not necessarily angry bout the new rules, but I agree that they are really vague. What may have started out as well-intentioned, or at least neutral, could definitely skew in a strange direction with the loose wording of the new rules
1
Reply
cinejanie
cinejanie
 · June 3, 2025
Exactly! So many red carpets have turned into a parade of clichés, where all that’s left for the audience is ranking who looked better or who messed up. I really hope they take your advice.
Reply